They wanted me to on to discuss the fact that the Irish Republic's football team have shirts commemorating the 1916 Easter Rising. The invitation came on the back of newspaper coverage of a statement I had issued on the matter.
I asked the woman who rang, who else would be on the programme with me and she said she didn't know. I made the point that I would not be going on to discuss this with a 'commentator' or a nationalist politician. I explained that there was no point in going on if they could not get someone from the Football Association of Ireland and preferably their chief executive John Delaney.
John Delaney, FAI chief executive |
She asked if I would debate it with someone from the football world in the Republic but I pressed the point that it had to be someone from the FAI. They are responsible for the team and for the choice of a team kit commemorating the 1916 Easter rebellion.
A short time later she rang back to say that the FAI had declined to put up a spokesperson for Talkback, so I said that I wouldn't take part in the programme.
I would have been keen to confront John Delaney on the programme because it would have been an opportunity to discuss 1916 team shirt with the chief executive of the organisation that chose it.
It would also have been an opportunity to discuss the statement he once made about their team singing rebel songs on the team bus. Indeed he himself was once recorded in a Dublin bar singing a song about a member of the Provisional IRA. So it is probably not surprising that the FAI didn't put up a spokesman.
But this raises a wider issue about Talkback and similar programmes. They let certain organisations and individuals off the hook.
Some time ago there was a controversy about Carrick Hill republican Frank 'Dipper' Dempsey. I was invited into the Radio Ulster studio but Dempsey went AWOL and they said they couldn't contact him. In that way Dempsey was able to avoid scrutiny and he was allowed to avoid it.
I'm rather tired of being brought on to programmes and then set against a nationalist politician or a 'commentator'. It allows Radio Ulster to have a lively debate but it reinforces a public perception of constant political bickering and allows people like John Delaney and Frank 'Dipper' Dempsey off the hook.
I get somewhat confused when they invite Jude Collins on to speak, or should that be rant???
ReplyDeleteA part from him having a blog, that states his position and views who does he represent??? What body does he represent, what is he an expert in and were is his mandate??? If this is the case they should get me on as I have a blog and I can put the case for Unionism and Loyalists and I can be as controversial and partial.
Nelson, with your statement that commemorating the 1916 rising encourages republican terrorism and that as such much of The Republic's celebrations were in bad taste, Is it safe to assume that we will see you front and centre protesting the next orange order march on The Twelfth? After all if commemorating 1916 is incitement to terrorism then surely so is commemorating The Battle of the Boyne. Many UVF terrorists were inspired by these marches. My own personal view is that as a sovereign nation the Republic of Ireland is entitled to celebrate her independence (or at least its declaration) in any way she see's fit, much as the Orange order does. Or is it just that you are opposed to The Republic celebrating a historic battle but you see nothing wrong with The Orange Order doing the same for a different historic battle?
ReplyDeleteJust to clarify I am a proud Irishman from Connacht, I support NI's right to self determination and I completely renounce and condemn the IRA (Provo, continuity and Real etc.). I have never and would never vote for Sinn Fein or Gerry Adams. I love my country as you do yours and all I want is to be free to remember the history of my country and the men who died to earn the independence that I cherish just as you remember the men who died to give you the Union that you so cherish.